Transplantation of human cord blood mononuclear cells and umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells in autism Report Summary

Transplantation of human cord blood mononuclear cells and umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells in autism Report Summary

Author or authors of report : Yong-Tao Lv, Yun Zhang, Min Liu, Jia-na-ti Qiuwaxi, Paul Ashwood, Sungho Charles Cho, Ying Huan, Ru-Cun Ge, Xing-Wang Chen, Zhao-Jing Wang, Byung-Jo Kim & Xiang Hu
Date of report : 2013-08-27

Background:

  • Autism is a pervasive neurodevelopmental disorder with no defined mechanisms of pathogenesis, and therapy is mostly limited to behavioral interventions.
  • Stem cell transplantation may offer a unique treatment strategy for autism due to the observed immune and neural dysregulation in the disease.
  • This study is a non-randomized, open-label, single-center phase I/II trial that investigated the safety and efficacy of combined transplantation of human cord blood mononuclear cells (CBMNCs) and umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (UCMSCs) in treating children with autism.

Methods:

  • 37 subjects diagnosed with autism were enrolled and divided into three groups:
    1. CBMNC group (14 subjects) - received CBMNC transplantation and rehabilitation therapy.
    2. Combination group (9 subjects) - received both CBMNC and UCMSC transplantation and rehabilitation therapy.
    3. Control group (14 subjects) - received only rehabilitation therapy.
  • Transplantations included four stem cell infusions through intravenous and intrathecal injections once a week.
  • Treatment safety was evaluated with laboratory examinations and clinical assessment of adverse effects.
  • The Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS), Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale, and Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) were used to assess therapeutic efficacy before and after treatment.

Results:

  • No significant safety issues were related to the treatment, and no severe adverse effects were observed.
  • Statistically significant differences were shown on CARS, ABC scores, and CGI evaluation in the two treatment groups compared to the control at 24 weeks post-treatment (p < 0.05).

Conclusions:

  • Transplantation of CBMNCs demonstrated efficacy compared to the control group.
  • The combination of CBMNCs and UCMSCs showed larger therapeutic effects than the CBMNC transplantation alone.
  • No safety issues were noted during infusion and the monitoring period.